In the Chief of India Justice House, lawyers wrote 600 to their head of court to influence the judiciary.
They accuse the “interest group thin with power” of massaging the judges with sound and other actions. These actions, therefore, are against the autonomy of the institution, and it may be written in this letter.
Signees encompass a wide spectrum of individuals with abundant experience – senior advocates from nationwide who have spent decades practising in courts. They stressed that meddling in the control of the automated circuit is viewed negatively.
The judiciary has been playing the role of guardian of rights and the true moot of this democracy in India from the beginning. Legal mechanisms for implementing internal policies are often substituted by illegal means of decision-making influence. This may seriously affect the role of government in popular participation in the public decision-making process.
Experts have raised this concern, pointing out thostilety campaigns that judges may avoid crucial decisions or their subconscious can be influenced in making favourable rulings.
Nevertheless, the CJI and members of the Court have stressed that they all would stay fair and will give finalizations based on facts. The question still stands as to whether the concerns will be looked into and dealt with properly or not.
Corroborating the inviolability and unflinching reliability of courts’ constitutional requirements is paramount for hoaxing the democratic form of governance and people’s beliefs in the justice system.
