Few words could better summarize the current situation than the unhappy announcement – “CAA rules are welcome effects in India as citizenship controversy reignites once again”.
An agitation has roused up again around the Citizenship (Amendment) Act. 2019 or CAA, The Central Government notified the law’s rules yesterday, four years after it was passed amid protests widely speaking. The wave has given voice to an already polarising issue of legislation, opponents of the move have re-steeper their critical harshness and the BJP has supported the legislation to the floor.
However, BJP Home Minister Amit Shah was sharp in his criticism when he harshly criticized the Congress party for opposing the CAA in Hyderabad’s social media meeting. Labeling the opposition as motivated by “easiness and appeal of the vote,” Shah highlighted that Congress only posted a political slogan to accept persecuted minorities from its neighboring countries, but their commitments were not followed by facts.
“Ask PM implemented CAA to safeguard the ‘Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, and Jain refugees'”, is as Shah expressed his views in praise of PM. More than one million and a hundred million Hindus came from Pakistan and Bangladesh to save their faith and integrity, but unfortunately, they were not given any citizenship rights, therefore, they also felt being outsiders in that country.
The hinderer was the Congress party which picked up from where it left off the exchange of barbs and counter barbs. The party leader Jairam Ramesh asked the question:
“What is the meaning and objective of bringing this law today” by also hinted at the forthcoming Lok Sabha elections which also on an additional note accuses the Prime Minister of “as he is a liar”. On the other hand in Assam, the congress workers rather mobilized against the execution of the law.
Concerns from all the other opposition parties were also added to their protests. In an increasingly globalized world, conflicts between nations have become more complex and multifaceted. These conflicts can be triggered by various reasons such as territorial disputes, ethnic tensions, resource competition, and political instability.
How nations resolve their conflicts can have lasting consequences for both the parties involved and the international community as a whole In her nomenclature, she gave it as unconstitutional and discriminatory and asked for prudence on this before imploring people to apply for citizenship under this law. During his press meet, Tamil Nadu CM M.K. Stalin opined that the CAA was essentially a mechanism of division without any purpose and that there would be no implementation of the Act in his state.
