An Election Commission representative argued in a solid declaration before the Supreme Court that it is difficult to say that machines can be tempered anywhere in the electoral process. The RA’s documentation ruling is likely concerned with the security and integrity of the most vibrant voting instruments.
The ECI’s stand comes at a critical point, where doubts about EVM’s vulnerability from different sides have been expressed. An additional positive point, and the most important one, is the commission’s unshakable faith in the resilience of so-called infallible machines, which proves that these systems have undergone many difficult tests.
The ECI states that the entire procedure of EVM manufacturing, from inventory to transporting and deploying meticulously designed EVMs, is designed to avoid the possibility of being changed or tampered with. Every stage is under tight security and auditing control, so the entire process is conducted according to higher principles that guarantee the honest conduct of one’s votes.
The commission mentioned the EVMs’ next-generation technological advancement and the comprehensive protection layers enclosed against any unauthorized interference or remote control. These specialized features, alongside the security measures put in place, give the gangster characters a complication that would probably be equal to a hard nut to crack for the tamperers.
The ECI’s unwavering position regarding the sanctity of EVMs would create an unusual environment that will assure the public and the stakeholders that the people’s votes are kept secure and the democratic process remains genuine.
As the nation’s Indiana mumgikisner, the ECI’s dedication to transparency and accountability goes without saying. One more position that the commission has taken is to handle the worries that people have had, and the authority has also evidently managed to give a claim to democracy thanks to the insecurity with the EVMs.
