Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the wordpress-seo domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /var/www/hindustandot.com/site/web/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114
SC rules against quashing sexual harassment cases. | Hindustan Dot
India News

SC rules against quashing sexual harassment cases.

The Supreme Court set aside the Rajasthan High Court’s order, which had quashed a sexual harassment case due to compromise, and ordered a continuance of the case.

A Bench of Justices CT Ravikumar and PV Sanjay Kumar ordered, “The impugned order is quashed and set aside, FIR and criminal proceedings be proceeded with per law”. The bench clarified that it has not commented on the matter’s merits.

The judgment came in a matter relating to whether a High Court, while exercising powers under Section 482 CrPC, has the power to quash a sexual harassment case based on a compromise between the accused and the survivor reserving its verdict in October last year, Bar and Bench reported.

https://twitter.com/publictvnews/status/1854439140005384296

The case is in connection with the sexual harassment of a 15-year-old girl whose father had filed an FIR. However, the accused and the victim’s family reached a compromise based on which the accused moved the Rajasthan High Court seeking quashing of the case.

Taking cognizance of the plea, the High Court has quashed the criminal case, Bar and Bench reported.

The matter went to the Supreme Court as an appeal by one Ramji Lal Bairwa, a third party not affected, on the ground that an objection to the High Court’s order was raised.

The top court initially said a petition in a criminal case could not be filed by an unaffected party. However, it later decided to examine the issue. It subsequently ordered that the accused and the father of the victim be made parties to the case.

A Bench of then Chief Justice of India UU Lalit and Justice JB Pardiwala had, in September 2022, appointed former Kerala High Court judge R Basant as Amicus Curiae in the matter to assist the court. The top court pronounced the verdict today.

Source
News18

HD News Desk

From local issues to national events and global affairs, Hindustan Dot's news desk covers the latest news and developments from India and the world.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button